This week's ratings are listed below in terms of generic win probability. The GWP is the probability a team would beat the league average team at a neutral site. Each team's opponent's average GWP is also listed, which can be considered to-date strength of schedule, and all ratings include adjustments for opponent strength.GWP is based on a logistic regression model applied to current team stats. The model includes offensive and defensive passing and running efficiency, offensive turnover rates, and team penalty rates. A full explanation of the methodology can be found here. This year, however, I've made one important change based on research that strongly indicates that defensive interception rates are highly random and not consistent throughout the year. Accordingly, I've removed them from the model and updated the weights of the remaining variables.
Offensive rank (ORANK) is the ranking of offensive generic win probability which is based on each team's offensive efficiency stats only. In other words, it's the team's GWP assuming it had a league-average defense. DRANK is is a team's generic win probability rank assuming it had a league-average offense.
| RANK | TEAM | LAST WK | GWP | Opp GWP | ORANK | DRANK |
| 1 | WAS | 1 | 0.82 | 0.52 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | PHI | 2 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 5 | 4 |
| 3 | CAR | 4 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 9 | 3 |
| 4 | SD | 3 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 4 | 16 |
| 5 | CHI | 7 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 10 | 7 |
| 6 | NYG | 8 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 1 | 15 |
| 7 | MIA | 12 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 2 | 24 |
| 8 | NO | 9 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 6 | 18 |
| 9 | TB | 14 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 17 | 2 |
| 10 | BUF | 5 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 21 | 10 |
| 11 | PIT | 6 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 26 | 1 |
| 12 | ATL | 11 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 7 | 21 |
| 13 | DAL | 10 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 12 | 11 |
| 14 | ARI | 13 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 8 | 19 |
| 15 | TEN | 15 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 18 | 8 |
| 16 | MIN | 17 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 22 | 9 |
| 17 | GB | 18 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 14 | 13 |
| 18 | IND | 20 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 13 | 14 |
| 19 | NYJ | 16 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 30 | 12 |
| 20 | BAL | 23 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 25 | 6 |
| 21 | DEN | 21 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 16 | 29 |
| 22 | HOU | 24 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 15 | 30 |
| 23 | JAX | 19 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 11 | 28 |
| 24 | OAK | 22 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 23 | 20 |
| 25 | NE | 27 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 27 | 26 |
| 26 | CLE | 28 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 20 | 23 |
| 27 | STL | 26 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 19 | 27 |
| 28 | SEA | 25 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 24 | 25 |
| 29 | SF | 29 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 31 | 17 |
| 30 | CIN | 30 | 0.19 | 0.53 | 32 | 22 |
| 31 | KC | 31 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 29 | 31 |
| 32 | DET | 32 | 0.17 | 0.56 | 28 | 32 |
The to-date season efficiency stats are listed below.
| TEAM | OPASS | ORUN | OINTRATE | OFUMRATE | DPASS | DRUN | DINTRATE | PENRATE |
| ARI | 7.1 | 3.3 | 0.022 | 0.027 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 0.014 | 0.41 |
| ATL | 6.4 | 4.8 | 0.024 | 0.009 | 6.4 | 4.7 | 0.021 | 0.35 |
| BAL | 5.7 | 3.8 | 0.036 | 0.030 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.042 | 0.48 |
| BUF | 6.8 | 3.8 | 0.019 | 0.028 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 0.018 | 0.30 |
| CAR | 7.1 | 3.7 | 0.022 | 0.018 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 0.019 | 0.39 |
| CHI | 6.5 | 3.6 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 0.035 | 0.40 |
| CIN | 4.1 | 3.4 | 0.034 | 0.035 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 0.017 | 0.36 |
| CLE | 5.3 | 3.8 | 0.029 | 0.024 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 0.045 | 0.40 |
| DAL | 7.0 | 4.6 | 0.030 | 0.036 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 0.008 | 0.51 |
| DEN | 7.0 | 4.6 | 0.027 | 0.032 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 0.009 | 0.36 |
| DET | 5.3 | 4.2 | 0.031 | 0.036 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 0.005 | 0.42 |
| GB | 6.7 | 3.7 | 0.018 | 0.028 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 0.056 | 0.61 |
| HOU | 6.8 | 4.3 | 0.033 | 0.029 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 0.026 | 0.21 |
| IND | 6.2 | 3.4 | 0.034 | 0.009 | 5.8 | 4.2 | 0.025 | 0.44 |
| JAX | 5.8 | 4.1 | 0.018 | 0.014 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 0.027 | 0.38 |
| KC | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.034 | 0.025 | 7.3 | 5.6 | 0.031 | 0.28 |
| MIA | 7.6 | 3.8 | 0.014 | 0.020 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 0.019 | 0.30 |
| MIN | 5.8 | 4.3 | 0.033 | 0.028 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 0.018 | 0.46 |
| NE | 5.5 | 4.2 | 0.028 | 0.016 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 0.041 | 0.29 |
| NO | 8.1 | 3.4 | 0.023 | 0.031 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 0.021 | 0.50 |
| NYG | 6.7 | 5.1 | 0.018 | 0.014 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 0.038 | 0.50 |
| NYJ | 5.9 | 4.6 | 0.050 | 0.023 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 0.020 | 0.31 |
| OAK | 5.3 | 4.3 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 0.032 | 0.41 |
| PHI | 6.8 | 4.1 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 5.6 | 3.5 | 0.035 | 0.34 |
| PIT | 5.9 | 3.9 | 0.036 | 0.033 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 0.025 | 0.43 |
| SD | 8.1 | 3.9 | 0.026 | 0.017 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 0.019 | 0.37 |
| SF | 6.0 | 4.5 | 0.045 | 0.044 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 0.031 | 0.48 |
| SS | 4.7 | 4.4 | 0.036 | 0.010 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 0.009 | 0.30 |
| STL | 5.3 | 4.0 | 0.020 | 0.023 | 7.3 | 4.8 | 0.029 | 0.45 |
| TB | 5.6 | 4.3 | 0.026 | 0.014 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 0.046 | 0.48 |
| TEN | 5.9 | 4.3 | 0.026 | 0.017 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 0.048 | 0.38 |
| WAS | 6.7 | 4.7 | 0.000 | 0.016 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 0.018 | 0.35 |
| Avg | 6.2 | 4.1 | 0.026 | 0.023 | 6.3 | 4.1 | 0.026 | 0.39 |
WAS
PHI
CAR
SD
CHI
NYG
MIA
NO
TB
BUF
PIT
ATL
DAL
ARI
TEN
MIN
GB
IND
NYJ
BAL
DEN
HOU
JAX
OAK
NE
CLE
STL
SEA
SF
CIN
KC
DET
Did you ever post the weights of the remaining variables that resulted from the removal of defensive interception rate?
ReplyDeleteThanks for reminding me. I've been working on other stuff, but here they are. I'll draft a new post explaining the methodology and try to include a sample calculation. But here's a quick and dirty version.
ReplyDeleteFor team B vs. team A, the new coefficients are:
const -0.34
Ahome 0.73
ATRUOPASS 0.46
AORUN 0.25
ATRUDPASS -0.62
ADRUN -0.25
AOINTRATE -19.44
ADINTRATE 0.00
AOFUMRATE -19.38
APENRATE -1.53
BTRUOPASS -0.46
BORUN -0.25
BTRUDPASS 0.62
BDRUN 0.24
BOINTRATE 19.20
BDINTRATE 0.00
BOFUMRATE 19.80
BPENRATE 1.52
Just an observation. It is interesting that more objective, calculation-based ranking models recognize teams like PHI, SD, & CHI while the "pundits'" rankings appear to recognize total wins listing said teams in the mediocre range. I would like to think the more subjective lists would be able to account for the unlucky.
ReplyDelete