tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post248736349040006535..comments2023-11-05T04:16:44.937-05:00Comments on Advanced Football Analytics (formerly Advanced NFL Stats): Playoff Team Efficiency ComparisonUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-57679427620032185462008-01-02T08:57:00.000-05:002008-01-02T08:57:00.000-05:00Maybe "many" is not correct. But WAS and TN did no...Maybe "many" is not correct. But WAS and TN did not play against full strength teams. IND, PIT, SEA, TB, JAX, and GB all played backups themselves.<BR/><BR/>But I can rerun the probabilities with week 17 data just to see how much it would change things.Brian Burkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-70289742857555067882008-01-02T08:49:00.000-05:002008-01-02T08:49:00.000-05:00Many of the teams you cite played against teams th...Many of the teams you cite played against teams that did not play at full strength.<BR/><BR/>But I did check, especially because of the Giants. They did so well against a very strong team in week 17. However, by using wk 17 data their probability against TB only goes from 0.21 to 0.22.Brian Burkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-27501308520149835492008-01-02T08:14:00.000-05:002008-01-02T08:14:00.000-05:00How much would the numbers change if you included ...How much would the numbers change if you included Week 17 performances? Granted, including the TB or IND practice squad stats would make this comparison less useful, but TN, NE, NYG, DAL, WAS all played starters for most or all of their games.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com