
Offensive rank (ORANK) is offensive generic win probability, which is based on each team's offensive efficiency stats only. In other words, it's the team's GWP assuming it had a league-average defense. DRANK is is a team's generic win probability rank assuming it had a league-average offense.
GWP is based on a logistic regression model applied to current team stats. The model includes offensive and defensive passing and running efficiency, offensive turnover rates, defensive interception rates, and team penalty rates. If you're scratching your head wondering why a team is ranked where it is, just scroll down to the second table to see the stats of all 32 teams.
Click on the table headers to sort:
RANK | TEAM | LAST WK | GWP | Opp GWP | O RANK | D RANK |
1 | 2 | 0.82 | 0.46 | 1 | 13 | |
2 | 1 | 0.81 | 0.42 | 3 | 4 | |
3 | 3 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 10 | 1 | |
4 | 4 | 0.78 | 0.49 | 4 | 5 | |
5 | 7 | 0.73 | 0.48 | 5 | 16 | |
6 | 6 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 2 | 24 | |
7 | 5 | 0.70 | 0.47 | 7 | 14 | |
8 | 9 | 0.67 | 0.44 | 15 | 3 | |
9 | 13 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 13 | 6 | |
10 | 11 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 9 | 9 | |
11 | 8 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 11 | 11 | |
12 | 10 | 0.59 | 0.44 | 8 | 22 | |
13 | 14 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 21 | 2 | |
14 | 15 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 6 | 27 | |
15 | 12 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 12 | 17 | |
16 | 16 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 14 | 23 | |
17 | 19 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 17 | 15 | |
18 | 17 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 18 | 19 | |
19 | 20 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 16 | 31 | |
20 | 23 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 19 | 18 | |
21 | 21 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 22 | 10 | |
22 | 18 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 24 | 8 | |
23 | 22 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 20 | 21 | |
24 | 24 | 0.39 | 0.51 | 27 | 7 | |
25 | 25 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 25 | 20 | |
26 | 26 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 28 | 12 | |
27 | 27 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 23 | 29 | |
28 | 31 | 0.21 | 0.56 | 26 | 30 | |
29 | 28 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 31 | 25 | |
30 | 30 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 30 | 32 | |
31 | 29 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 29 | 26 | |
32 | 32 | 0.13 | 0.60 | 32 | 28 |
And here are the sortable raw team efficiency stats. Passing, running, and penalties are in yards per relevant play. Fumbles and interception stats are in turnovers per relevant play.
TEAM | OPASS | ORUN | OINT% | OFUM% | DPASS | DRUN | DINT% | PENRATE |
ARI | 6.2 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 0.40 |
ATL | 6.4 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.39 |
BAL | 6.4 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.59 |
BUF | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 0.44 |
CAR | 5.4 | 4.7 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 0.36 |
CHI | 6.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 5.9 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 0.44 |
CIN | 6.4 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.35 |
CLE | 3.9 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 0.34 |
DAL | 7.6 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 0.49 |
DEN | 6.4 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 0.35 |
DET | 4.8 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 0.48 |
GB | 6.8 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 0.51 |
HOU | 7.5 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 0.43 |
IND | 7.8 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 0.32 |
JAC | 6.1 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 6.9 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 0.29 |
KC | 4.6 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 0.35 |
MIA | 4.8 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 0.36 |
MIN | 6.7 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 0.31 |
NE | 7.1 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 5.4 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 0.39 |
NO | 8.2 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 0.39 |
NYG | 6.8 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 0.45 |
NYJ | 5.7 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 0.38 |
OAK | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 0.35 |
PHI | 6.3 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 5.3 | 0.48 |
PIT | 7.6 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.38 |
SD | 7.3 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 0.36 |
SF | 5.2 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 0.42 |
SEA | 5.6 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 0.32 |
STL | 5.0 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 0.48 |
TB | 5.0 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 0.35 |
TEN | 5.4 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 0.39 |
WAS | 5.8 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 0.46 |
Avg | 6.1 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 0.40 |
Any explanation for why the Steelers beat the Broncos 28-10, but gain no GWP on them?
ReplyDeleteEarly this week
ReplyDeleteWhen are the Win Probabillities going to be published on the short weeks?
ReplyDeletei need to hand in my survivor pick by tomorrow. we'll you have the predictions ready midday tomorrow?
ReplyDeleteGB is WAY over-rated here. The Vikings have beaten them twice this season, have a 3-game lead on them in the division, and are ranked lower !?!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNo wait, I got the percentages wrong. Shouldn't Denver's interception percentage be 1.5? This might explain why they haven't dropped this week.
ReplyDeleteAlso, the Chargers' fumble rate is listed as 0.0.
ReplyDelete0.0 for SD's fumble rate is for rushing fumbles, which considers running and sack fumbles. Receiving and special teams fumbles are excluded. They're simply not consistent in any way.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Brian.
ReplyDeleteMy Raiders show up in your stats to be just as bad as they play.
ReplyDeleteThanks