Oct 14, 2013

Sunday's Numbers Have Been Crunched

Sunday's numbers are now available, including advanced stat box scores, top players of the week, team stats, and season leader boards.

7 comments:

  1. Random question: how does CJ Spiller have a 0.17 WPA (good for 19th among RB), but with a -12.5 EPA (12th worst)?

    The only other example I could find of numbers close to those just from quickly skimming the list was Ben Tate (0.27, -8.9).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good question. I looked up his plays and it turns out Spiller had a large number of negative EPA plays in very low leverage situations. He has a net of -19 EPA when the WPA swings were only between -.01 and +.01.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So how do we interpret those two numbers next to each other? In other words, is it sort of like BABIP in baseball, where an artificially high/low number likely isn't sustainable?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It will very probably regress. The way to really interpret them is that WPA is very heavily dependent on circumstance, most of which are non-repeating. EPA is less dependent on circumstance and is more consistent/predictable. Still, both are retrospective numbers that capture the past.

    If you're looking for predictive numbers, I would synthesize something between SR and EPA.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gotcha. So EPA is probably more representative of his real contributions then, yes?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wouldn't say 'real' because EPA contains low-leverage 'trash' plays. But it's more stable from game to game and year to year.

    ReplyDelete
  7. > If you're looking for predictive numbers, I would synthesize something
    > between SR and EPA.

    Do you know if anyone has looked at median EPA/P (or something similar) as a player stat?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.