This week's ratings are listed below in terms of generic win probability. The GWP is the probability a team would beat the league average team at a neutral site. Each team's opponent's average GWP is also listed, which can be considered to-date strength of schedule, and all ratings include adjustments for opponent strength.
GWP is based on a logistic regression model applied to current team stats. The model includes offensive and defensive passing and running efficiency, offensive turnover rates, and team penalty rates. A full explanation of the methodology can be found here. This year, however, I've made one important change based on research that strongly indicates that defensive interception rates are highly random and not consistent throughout the year. Accordingly, I've removed them from the model and updated the weights of the remaining variables.
Offensive rank (ORANK) is the ranking of offensive generic win probability which is based on each team's offensive efficiency stats only. In other words, it's the team's GWP assuming it had a league-average defense. DRANK is is a team's generic win probability rank assuming it had a league-average offense.RANK TEAM LAST WK GWP Opp GWP ORANK DRANK 1 WAS 1 0.82 0.52 3 5 2 PHI 2 0.81 0.58 5 4 3 CAR 4 0.75 0.58 9 3 4 SD 3 0.74 0.54 4 16 5 CHI 7 0.70 0.57 10 7 6 NYG 8 0.68 0.42 1 15 7 MIA 12 0.67 0.52 2 24 8 NO 9 0.65 0.58 6 18 9 TB 14 0.64 0.58 17 2 10 BUF 5 0.63 0.49 21 10 11 PIT 6 0.63 0.48 26 1 12 ATL 11 0.63 0.53 7 21 13 DAL 10 0.62 0.53 12 11 14 ARI 13 0.59 0.61 8 19 15 TEN 15 0.57 0.38 18 8 16 MIN 17 0.50 0.55 22 9 17 GB 18 0.50 0.48 14 13 18 IND 20 0.49 0.51 13 14 19 NYJ 16 0.46 0.44 30 12 20 BAL 23 0.46 0.47 25 6 21 DEN 21 0.45 0.48 16 29 22 HOU 24 0.43 0.45 15 30 23 JAX 19 0.43 0.51 11 28 24 OAK 22 0.38 0.51 23 20 25 NE 27 0.35 0.45 27 26 26 CLE 28 0.35 0.55 20 23 27 STL 26 0.33 0.60 19 27 28 SEA 25 0.32 0.49 24 25 29 SF 29 0.33 0.48 31 17 30 CIN 30 0.19 0.53 32 22 31 KC 31 0.18 0.51 29 31 32 DET 32 0.17 0.56 28 32
The to-date season efficiency stats are listed below.TEAM OPASS ORUN OINTRATE OFUMRATE DPASS DRUN DINTRATE PENRATE ARI 7.1 3.3 0.022 0.027 6.9 4.0 0.014 0.41 ATL 6.4 4.8 0.024 0.009 6.4 4.7 0.021 0.35 BAL 5.7 3.8 0.036 0.030 5.4 2.8 0.042 0.48 BUF 6.8 3.8 0.019 0.028 6.0 3.8 0.018 0.30 CAR 7.1 3.7 0.022 0.018 5.5 4.0 0.019 0.39 CHI 6.5 3.6 0.017 0.019 5.7 3.7 0.035 0.40 CIN 4.1 3.4 0.034 0.035 6.4 4.3 0.017 0.36 CLE 5.3 3.8 0.029 0.024 6.5 4.7 0.045 0.40 DAL 7.0 4.6 0.030 0.036 5.7 3.9 0.008 0.51 DEN 7.0 4.6 0.027 0.032 6.8 5.4 0.009 0.36 DET 5.3 4.2 0.031 0.036 8.4 4.7 0.005 0.42 GB 6.7 3.7 0.018 0.028 5.3 4.9 0.056 0.61 HOU 6.8 4.3 0.033 0.029 7.2 4.5 0.026 0.21 IND 6.2 3.4 0.034 0.009 5.8 4.2 0.025 0.44 JAX 5.8 4.1 0.018 0.014 7.0 4.4 0.027 0.38 KC 4.4 4.4 0.034 0.025 7.3 5.6 0.031 0.28 MIA 7.6 3.8 0.014 0.020 7.2 3.7 0.019 0.30 MIN 5.8 4.3 0.033 0.028 6.3 2.9 0.018 0.46 NE 5.5 4.2 0.028 0.016 6.8 4.4 0.041 0.29 NO 8.1 3.4 0.023 0.031 6.4 4.3 0.021 0.50 NYG 6.7 5.1 0.018 0.014 5.5 3.8 0.038 0.50 NYJ 5.9 4.6 0.050 0.023 6.0 3.2 0.020 0.31 OAK 5.3 4.3 0.015 0.031 6.5 4.5 0.032 0.41 PHI 6.8 4.1 0.016 0.017 5.6 3.5 0.035 0.34 PIT 5.9 3.9 0.036 0.033 4.4 2.8 0.025 0.43 SD 8.1 3.9 0.026 0.017 6.4 4.0 0.019 0.37 SF 6.0 4.5 0.045 0.044 6.4 3.6 0.031 0.48 SS 4.7 4.4 0.036 0.010 6.9 4.0 0.009 0.30 STL 5.3 4.0 0.020 0.023 7.3 4.8 0.029 0.45 TB 5.6 4.3 0.026 0.014 5.5 3.6 0.046 0.48 TEN 5.9 4.3 0.026 0.017 4.9 3.7 0.048 0.38 WAS 6.7 4.7 0.000 0.016 5.5 3.8 0.018 0.35 Avg 6.2 4.1 0.026 0.023 6.3 4.1 0.026 0.39
- Home
- team rankings
- Week 8 Efficiency Rankings
Week 8 Efficiency Rankings
By
Brian Burke
published on 10/28/2008
in
team efficiency,
team rankings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Did you ever post the weights of the remaining variables that resulted from the removal of defensive interception rate?
Thanks for reminding me. I've been working on other stuff, but here they are. I'll draft a new post explaining the methodology and try to include a sample calculation. But here's a quick and dirty version.
For team B vs. team A, the new coefficients are:
const -0.34
Ahome 0.73
ATRUOPASS 0.46
AORUN 0.25
ATRUDPASS -0.62
ADRUN -0.25
AOINTRATE -19.44
ADINTRATE 0.00
AOFUMRATE -19.38
APENRATE -1.53
BTRUOPASS -0.46
BORUN -0.25
BTRUDPASS 0.62
BDRUN 0.24
BOINTRATE 19.20
BDINTRATE 0.00
BOFUMRATE 19.80
BPENRATE 1.52
Just an observation. It is interesting that more objective, calculation-based ranking models recognize teams like PHI, SD, & CHI while the "pundits'" rankings appear to recognize total wins listing said teams in the mediocre range. I would like to think the more subjective lists would be able to account for the unlucky.