Tebow despite being in accurate throws an accurate go route or other variations of it (sluggo, double move etc). Saying Tebows long completions vs Pitt is a stretch.
Also Denver doesn't really run an option offense. They have installed a few option plays in the playbook but they are getting further and further away from them.
And saying New England is good for 35 to 40 points every game is inaccurate. They can score that many points but I wouldn't rely on them too.
/End Bronco rant
Leave a Reply
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Welcome to the Advanced Football Analytics archive. This is where you can find over 1,500 ground-breaking articles full of the most innovative research and analysis of modern NFL football.
Interested in publishing your own football research, analysis, or stat-based commentary? Advanced NFL Stats Community is the site to share your thoughts and ideas. There's plenty of data available to get started. All submissions will be accepted and published. Check it out!
Support Military Families
If you enjoy Advanced Football Analytics, please consider a small donation to The Fisher House, a place where families of injured servicemen can stay while visiting their hospitalized heroes.
Your link is to the old podcast.
the right one...
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fangraphs-audio-brian-burke-advanced-nfl-stats-2/
fixed, thanks
Tebow despite being in accurate throws an accurate go route or other variations of it (sluggo, double move etc). Saying Tebows long completions vs Pitt is a stretch.
Also Denver doesn't really run an option offense. They have installed a few option plays in the playbook but they are getting further and further away from them.
And saying New England is good for 35 to 40 points every game is inaccurate. They can score that many points but I wouldn't rely on them too.
/End Bronco rant