Stochastic Football
Plans and Gambles Among Former Etruscan Pirates
By
team efficiency Miami finished on the low-end of average in both offense and defense. Any other year, rookie quarterback Ryan
Tannehill's performance would have been thought promising. He wasn't good, but typically rookie quarterbacks are not good, and he wasn't
so bad as to seem unsalvageable. Rummaging through the last 13 years
of data: Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, Jay Cutler, Joe Flacco and
Matthew Stafford all performed comparably or worse than Tannehill.
Two things work against Tannehill: he was bad in a season when three
other rookie quarterbacks were very good to excellent, but that's
more a matter of perception. And he's old. At 25, he's but months
younger than Stafford and Josh Freeman. He's not comparing brands of
glucosamine chondroitin with Brandon Weeden, but he's not a baby face
still growing into his body. As an athlete, Tannehill's arrived.
Tannehill
won't see significant snaps in the preseason, and what snaps he sees
will not tell us much, but his risk and potential personify the Dolphins franchise. They
want to be an up-and-comer, on the verge of building a contender. If
Tannehill fails, they'll likely fall back among the gravediggers digging their own graves.
Miami
emphasized skill position talent in free agency, signing Mike
Wallace, Dustin Keller and Brandon Gibson, but allowing left tackle Jake Long to sign with St. Louis. Gibson and Keller are interesting as
players whose individual EPA/P significantly outperformed their
team's passing EPA/P.
Year | Keller EPA/P | Jets EPA/P |
2008 | 0.25 | 0.06 |
2009 | 0.15 | -0.06 |
2010 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
2011 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
2012 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Year | Gibson EPA/P | Rams EPA/P |
2009 | -0.11 | -0.16 |
2010 | 0.1 | -0.01 |
2011 | 0.2 | -0.15 |
2012 | 0.46 | 0.06 |
There's
an undoubted sense of untapped potential there, and should Wallace
bounce back to his level from 2009-2011 in which (passes to, from a very good quarterback, and in a consistently successful passing offense) Wallace averaged 59.8 EPA a season, and with Lamar Miller at
running back, Miami has the makings of a top-ten collection of skill-position talent.
That
could work should the corresponding gamble work, because at left
tackle, the Dolphins are interesting in the pejorative and terrifying
in the hyperbolic. Jonathan Martin allowed 8.75 sacks as a rookie,
playing mostly right tackle, and right tackle is where many thought
he fit best. He's what coaches affectionately call a “technician,”
but now playing at a position of exceptional athletes. If you squint,
you can see someone like Rodger Saffold--the exact player St. Louis
signed Jake Long to displace to right tackle. But former longtime
Packers offensive coordinator has experience with limited left
tackles.
The
preseason is where this mini-drama begins to play out. Despite the
buzz around the position, teams regularly succeed without
great left tackle play. As there are multiple antidotes to the
weakness. Keller is strictly a move tight end and shouldn't be
counted on for more than a chip block, but fourth-round pick Dion
Sims has the tackle-lite build of a blocking tight end, and Mike
Mayock described him as “one of the best in-line, blocking tight ends in 2013 draft.” Playing Keller out of the slot, and pairing
Sims with Martin could work against elite pass rushers. So that
personnel package, whoever populates the respective positions, and
specifically Sims performance as a pass blocker, should be
interesting to watch through the preseason. Conversely, Philbin could
chose to flood the field with receivers, preferring the “touchdown
or checkdown” style he perfected in Green Bay, and, like with
Aaron Rodgers, accept the sack toll in service of an explosive offense. For
that to work, Tannehill will have to prove to be that rare cat that
can take the sacks without suffering the injuries. He's got the athleticism. Knowing how to work that athleticism in the service of self-preservation is a rare skill.
The
preseason is the ultimate in process over results. There's much to
see for the savvy viewer, but that requires a little foreknowledge,
and a saint's patience for the boredom, bellyaching and smugness of
the men and women paid to announce, report and provide commentary.
After five exhibitions, it will not be clear whether Martin is
sinking or swimming, how Tannehill has developed or whether Miami's
emphasis on adding skill position talent will work. But we'll know a
little more about each, and we should know a lot more about the
Dolphins approach to maximizing what they can do, and minimizing what
they can't.
The Planet of Inexperience
I had
thought the Ravens were trapped in mediocrity. The two previous
years, the Baltimore offense had finished 14 and 13 in EPA/A. That ticked up to 12 in 2012. That is, presumably, not the kind of consistency people without insight forever harp on players and teams lacking. The defense was a bad mix of old and injured,
and young and not promising enough. The Ravens were ranked 19 in team efficiency, besting only the
young, romanticized Colts among playoff teams. Football Outsidersrated them a bit better but mostly because of special teams. I'll leave you to decide if that were prescient or a nice coincidence. Expected
W-L pegged them as 9.4-6.6—or about as remarkable as SPAM musubi. The team
seemed playoff fodder for the bigger and better. Plus, like many, I
didn't think Joe Flacco was a particularly good quarterback.
That
Baltimore won, that by winning Baltimore became the third
mediocre-seeming team to win in the last six years (joining the 2011
and 2007 Giants), is either a radical shift in the NFL or the exact
kind of fluke you would expect in a competition that combines high
variance and small sample size, and maybe both.
When I
was wee and hated the Cowboys and was just learning football but hated the Cowboys, I hated
the Cowboys because they seemed nigh unbeatable. Through the 80's and
into the mid-90's, the NFL seemed to be dominated by a small set of
warring dynasties. And when one of the Cowboys, 49ers or Redskins
made it to the Super Bowl, you could expect a laugher. I learned
football is great but the Super Bowl sucks. By halftime I yearned for the drama of the Bud
Bowl.
The
current Cowboys seem equally stuck in mediocrity. Over the last three
years Dallas has finished 16, 11 and 16 by team efficiency. Like
Flacco, it isn't clear Tony Romo is a good quarterback. It is
possible he is an average quarterback with elite surrounding talent.
It is yet impossible to disentangle quarterback from surrounding
talent, but one can't ignore the comparable performances of Romo and Jon Kitna in 2010, and over a reasonably large sample (Romo: 213 pass attempts; Kitna: 318), or that Kitna today teaches Math at a Tacoma high school. Globally speaking, it is not a quarterback's job
to amass EPA. It is, through his own skills and talents, to make
plays that add EPA. If we could pair a bad but not ruinously bad
quarterback with an All-Pro collection of offensive talent, we would
expect that quarterback to post good statistics while hurting his
team's chances of winning. That is sort of what happened to Romo's
backup, Kyle Orton, after he was traded from the Bears to Broncos.
Orton easily bested Jay Cutler by EPA in 2009, having inherited a
supercharged offense, but he was a shadow of what Cutler had been in 2008 with largely that same offense. For years now, Romo's
statistical performances have been fringe elite, but how much does
Romo contribute to those performances?
It's
yet impossible to say, and it is yet impossible to know if this
recent trend of mediocre teams getting hot in the playoffs and
winning the Super Bowl is a sure signal of change, or a blip, not to
be learned from or patterned after. The Cowboys were cast into a
rebuilding mode following a third straight season of not making the
playoffs and not finishing with a winning record. Romo, Jason Witten
and DeMarcus Ware are staring down their respective ages of decline.
Any team, even the Cowboys, would be happy to win a Super Bowl, one
Super Bowl, even if it means a subsequent offseason of dumping contracts, amassing dead money and going
young. So what's to do be done for the
mediocre and old, but rationally hopeful and not yet dead? Be prudent, or appear to seem prudent in the eyes
of media and fans: be bit players in free agency, trade down and
acquire picks, rebuild without admitting a rebuild? Or take one crazy
shot at it all while there's still has a crazy shot to take?
Reading
the tea leaves, it seems Dallas is playing it safe. The move to a 4-3
isn't quite so dramatic as it might otherwise seem, and in reality is
really more in line with what former coach Wade Phillips did
schematically. Phillips ran single-gap, 4-3 concepts through 3-4
alignments. Father of the Tampa-2, Monte Kiffin, cuts out the middle
man, and runs a traditional 4-3 through 4-3 alignments. This might
seem … more elegant, but messing with the routines and methods of
one of the great defenders of his generation seems … risky, both in
how Ware plays and the perception of how he plays. People are
superstitious and more than a little guarded in the presence of
change. Change that appears to fail is a hobnail to be pounded down
by fans, media and sometimes even players. Even a slow start, or a
perceived slow start, could start tongues a-clackin'. It doesn't help
that prior to the 2005 draft, Ware was dinged for “[lacking a] quick first step out of a three point stance,” and being“[e]ngulfed by larger opponents.” That all said, hiring a
legendary coach out of semi-retirement and pairing him with a
well-respected former head coach turned coordinator, Rod Marinelli,
is a deflecting move. Things might not work out. People are unlikely
to say much worse about Kiffin than “the game's passed him by.”
Unlike
the Dolphins, there isn't that same sense of intrigue about the
Cowboys preseason. They didn't go big in free agency. Their draft,
roundly criticized, focused on filling holes. I ignore after-draft
opinion mongering—who knows what farts get into the echo chamber.
Rookie center Travis Fredericks is expected to start, and seeing if
he can withstand NFL-caliber defensive tackles should be instructive.
Rookie safety J.J. Wilcox, as a one-year starter at safety following a conversion from running back, could develop very quickly and push for
snaps. But, mostly, this is a roster of old men, and the preseason is
anything but about old men. Given the strength of their passing
offense, Dallas has a peculiar window of contention. From now until
September, there isn't much for the Cowboys to accomplish but
survival.
Overall, I enjoyed this post, but have to quibble about the "supercharged offense" that you say Orton inherited. Yes, Brandon Marshall is quite good, as was their offensive line (as far as I can recall). Then you come to the not so mighty Knowshon Moreno, leading the rushing attack while averaging 3.8 yard per carry that year, and the second leading receiver who was the lowly Jabar Gaffney. Maybe Orton deserves a little more respect/credit. The same probably applies to an unheralded bozo like Matt Moore, who should probably get a shot somewhere.
Not for nothing, Sidney, but thank you for the comment. Discussion, intelligent disagreement--this is why I write.
As for Orton: Marshall and an excellent offensive line are six of ten, right there. Gaffney's middling, but he knew the system ... Moreno and Buckhalter are good-average receivers for RBs, same could be said about the TEs Scheffler and Graham--though, iirc, by 2009 Graham was kind of at his end and primarily a blocking tight end. I never underestimate Slot Machine (Stokley). To me that's one position short of a supercharged offense.
Just for rhetorical purposes I would contrast that with Aaron Rodgers' surrounding talent in 2011.